Curtis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Curtis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

73 S.W. 1133, 99 Mo. App. 508, 1903 Mo. App. LEXIS 220

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 27, 1903

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 73 S.W. 1133 (Curtis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curtis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co., 73 S.W. 1133, 99 Mo. App. 508, 1903 Mo. App. LEXIS 220 (Mo. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

BROADDUS, J.

This is a suit against defendant instituted by plaintiff to recover for loss of services of his minor son caused by injuries sustained by reason of his having been forcibly ejected from defendant’s train, while the same was in motion, at Cameron, Missouri. The plaintiff recovered judgment from which defendant appealed. The former is the father of the plaintiff in the case of Benjamin Curtis against this same defendant, decided’ at this term of court. The facts being the same upon which the defendant is sought to be held liable as in said former case, and the question of law being identical, for the reason there given this cause is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROADDUS, J.

This is a suit against defendant instituted by plaintiff to recover for loss of services of his minor son caused by injuries sustained by reason of his having been forcibly ejected from defendant’s train, while the same was in motion, at Cameron, Missouri. The plaintiff recovered judgment from which defendant appealed. The former is the father of the plaintiff in the case of Benjamin Curtis against this same defendant, decided’ at this term of court. The facts being the same upon which the defendant is sought to be held liable as in said former case, and the question of law being identical, for the reason there given this cause is affirmed.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 S.W. 1133, 99 Mo. App. 508, 1903 Mo. App. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-chicago-rock-island-pacific-railway-co-moctapp-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack