Curtis v. Buzard
98 A. 777, 254 Pa. 61, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 683
Opinion
This judgment is affirmed for the reason given by the learned trial judge for entering the nonsuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curtis v. Buzard, 98 A. 777, 254 Pa. 61, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 683 (Pa. 1916).
98 A. 777 (Curtis v. Buzard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tilghman v. Dollenberg
213 A.2d 324 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
Edelson v. Bernstein
2 Pa. D. & C.2d 443 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1954)
Weitzel v. Jukich
251 P.2d 542 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1952)
Neuman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.
51 A.2d 759 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)
Neuman v. Schweidel
50 Pa. D. & C. 311 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1944)
Peters v. Stroudsburg Trust Co.
35 A.2d 341 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Selman v. Shirley
91 P.2d 312 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1938)
Emery v. Third Nat. Bank of Pbg.
162 A. 281 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Bishoff v. Valley Dairy Co.
153 A. 133 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Mullin v. Gano
149 A. 488 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Hoagland v. Mulford
148 A. 864 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Henderson v. Plymouth Oil Co.
13 F.2d 932 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1926)
Grant v. Lovekin
132 A. 342 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Friend v. Hazlett
6 Pa. D. & C. 522 (Washington County Court of Common Pleas, 1924)
Long v. McAllister
118 A. 506 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
Browning v. Rodman
111 A. 877 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Williams v. Beltz
107 A. 298 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1919)
O'Rourke v. Blocksom
69 Pa. Super. 93 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)
Williams v. Beltz
101 A. 905 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1917)