Curtis v. Boyster

Missouri Court of Appeals

Curtis v. Boyster

743 S.W.2d 568, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 5098

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 22, 1987·No. No. 52627·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In plaintiffs’ personal injury action, the jury found defendant not negligent. Plaintiffs’ contentions on appeal, challenging a number of the trial court’s evidentiary rulings and an instruction, do not reveal any error of law or any abuse of discretion. A written opinion would serve no precedential purpose. We affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In plaintiffs’ personal injury action, the jury found defendant not negligent. Plaintiffs’ contentions on appeal, challenging a number of the trial court’s evidentiary rulings and an instruction, do not reveal any error of law or any abuse of discretion. A written opinion would serve no precedential purpose. We affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Curtis v. Boyster, 743 S.W.2d 568, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 5098 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

743 S.W.2d 568 (Curtis v. Boyster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.