Curtis v. Bailey

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Curtis v. Bailey

18 Mass. 198

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1822

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Mass. 198 (Curtis v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curtis v. Bailey, 18 Mass. 198 (Mass. 1822).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Court are of opinion, that’the judge of probate was correct in admitting the appellee to exhibit the account. It may happen, that other persons must necessarily take the place of a guardian in settling an account; for instance, where a guardian dies. It does not appear, by the statute, that it must be settled upon the oath of the guardian. The judge of probate might have sworn the appellee.¹

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The Court are of opinion, that’the judge of probate was correct in admitting the appellee to exhibit the account. It may happen, that other persons must necessarily take the place of a guardian in settling an account; for instance, where a guardian dies. It does not appear, by the statute, that it must be settled upon the oath of the guardian. The judge of probate might have sworn the appellee.¹

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Mass. 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-bailey-mass-1822.