Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Curtis v. Ashworth

Curtis v. Ashworth

143 S.E. 463, 38 Ga. App. 220, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 143
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 22, 1928
Docket17820
StatusPublished

This text of 143 S.E. 463 (Curtis v. Ashworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curtis v. Ashworth, 143 S.E. 463, 38 Ga. App. 220, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 143 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

The judgment of affirmance heretofore entered in this case (36 Ga. App. 783, 138 S. E. 286) having been reversed by the Supreme Court on certiorari (165 Ga. 782, 142 S. E. 111), and the former judgment of this court having been vacated and set aside, the judgment of the trial court is now reversed because it overruled the demurrer in which it was contended that there was a misjoinder of parties defendant. Direction is given that the plaintiff be permitted to amend his petition by striking O. W. Curtis as a defendant, leaving the case to proceed against the defendant Ella Curtis.

Judgment reversed, with direction.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Curtis v. Ashworth
142 S.E. 111 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Curtis v. Ashworth
138 S.E. 286 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 S.E. 463, 38 Ga. App. 220, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-ashworth-gactapp-1928.