Curtis T. Bedwell & Sons, Inc. v. Geppert Bros., Inc.

672 A.2d 1165, 143 N.J. 481
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 1, 1996·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court on the joint application of the parties either to defer the supplemental briefing schedule indefinitely or to dismiss the appeal without prejudice,

And the Court having considered the submissions of counsel,

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the application is granted and the within appeal is dismissed, without prejudice to an application to reopen should the federal action in DEP v. Gloucester Environmental Management Services, Docket No. 84-0152, not be resolved by the settlement of the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curtis T. Bedwell & Sons, Inc. v. Geppert Bros., Inc., 672 A.2d 1165, 143 N.J. 481 (N.J. 1996).

672 A.2d 1165 (Curtis T. Bedwell & Sons, Inc. v. Geppert Bros., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Celanese Ltd. v. Essex County Imp. Auth.
962 A.2d 591 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2009)
Kramer v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.
854 A.2d 948 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2004)
State v. Timmendequas
737 A.2d 55 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1999)
Li Fu v. Hong Fu
733 A.2d 1133 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1999)