Curtis Shabazz v. Barry L. Martin
This text of Curtis Shabazz v. Barry L. Martin (Curtis Shabazz v. Barry L. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-15-00172-CV
CURTIS SHABAZZ, APPELLANT
V.
BARRY L. MARTIN, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 47th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 103193-A, Honorable Dan L. Schaap, Presiding
May 21, 2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
Appellant Curtis Shabazz, a prison inmate appearing pro se, filed a notice of
appeal but did not pay the filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5. By letter of April 22, 2015
we directed Shabazz to pay the filing fee or file an affidavit of indigence, and if indigent,
to comply with Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 14 by filing an affidavit
relating to previous filings and a certified copy of his inmate account. See TEX. CIV.
PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 14.002(a) (West Supp. 2014) (stating that Chapter 14
applies to appeals brought by an inmate in an appellate court). The letter further notified Shabazz that his appeal would be subject to dismissal without further notice,
should he fail to comply. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
Shabazz has made no response to our letter. Accordingly, the appeal is
dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c); 43.2(f).
James T. Campbell Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Curtis Shabazz v. Barry L. Martin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-shabazz-v-barry-l-martin-texapp-2015.