Curtis McClendon v. State of Florida
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
CURTIS MCCLENDON, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D13-3815
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed July 8, 2014.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County. Jonathan E. Sjostrom, Judge.
Curtis McClendon, pro se, Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Wes Paxson, III, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appellant appeals the summary denial of a motion for postconviction
relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The State
concedes that grounds one, two and five were improperly denied as facially
insufficient because the trial court never granted leave to amend. Thus, we reverse and remand for the trial court to grant the appellant leave to amend grounds one,
two and five pursuant to Spera v. State, 971 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 2007) (holding that a
trial court must allow the defendant at least one opportunity to amend facially
insufficient claims). We otherwise affirm the order on appeal.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED and REMANDED in part.
WOLF and WETHERELL, JJ., and MONACO, TOBY S., ASSOCIATE JUDGE, CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curtis McClendon v. State of Florida (Curtis McClendon v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.