Curtis Lee Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 31, 2014·No. 01-11-00352-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Curtis Lee Johnson v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-11-00352-CR

Trial court case number: 1178448

Trial court: 208th District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s counsel in this case has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief stating there are no arguable grounds for appeal, based on Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Appellant has a right to respond to counsel’s motion. Pursuant to Kelly v. State, No. PD- 0702-13, 2014 WL 2865901 (Tex. Crim. App. June 25, 2014), we direct the Clerk of this Court to send, at no cost to appellant, a complete copy of the appellate record so that appellant may respond to the Anders brief. Appellant has 30 days from the date of this order to file a pro se response, if any, to the Anders brief and motion to withdraw filed by appellate counsel. The Anders brief in this appeal is included as an exhibit to the reporter’s record of the abatement hearing held May 5, 2014. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 31, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curtis Lee Johnson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Curtis Lee Johnson v. State (Curtis Lee Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)