CURTIS J. HOLZSCHUH v. EILEEN HOLZSCHUH
This text of CURTIS J. HOLZSCHUH v. EILEEN HOLZSCHUH (CURTIS J. HOLZSCHUH v. EILEEN HOLZSCHUH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
CURTIS JAY HOLZSCHUH, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3681 ) EILEEN WYATT HOLZSCHUH, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________)
Opinion filed April 5, 2019.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Roger A. Alcott, Senior Judge.
Curtis Jay Holzschuh, pro se.
Eileen Wyatt Holzschuh, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
CURTIS J. HOLZSCHUH v. EILEEN HOLZSCHUH, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-j-holzschuh-v-eileen-holzschuh-fladistctapp-2019.