CURTIS J. HOLZSCHUH v. EILEEN HOLZSCHUH

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 5, 2019
Docket18-3681
StatusPublished

This text of CURTIS J. HOLZSCHUH v. EILEEN HOLZSCHUH (CURTIS J. HOLZSCHUH v. EILEEN HOLZSCHUH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
CURTIS J. HOLZSCHUH v. EILEEN HOLZSCHUH, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

CURTIS JAY HOLZSCHUH, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3681 ) EILEEN WYATT HOLZSCHUH, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________)

Opinion filed April 5, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Roger A. Alcott, Senior Judge.

Curtis Jay Holzschuh, pro se.

Eileen Wyatt Holzschuh, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
CURTIS J. HOLZSCHUH v. EILEEN HOLZSCHUH, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-j-holzschuh-v-eileen-holzschuh-fladistctapp-2019.