Curtis Holland v. State
This text of Curtis Holland v. State (Curtis Holland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-99-0269-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
AUGUST 10, 2001
______________________________
CURTIS RAY HOLLAND, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
_________________________________
FROM THE 252 ND DISTRICT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY;
NO. 70662; HONORABLE LEONARD GIBLIN, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.
Appellant Curtis Ray Holland appealed his conviction of aggravated assault and the resulting sentence of five years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Department of Criminal Justice. The adjudication of appellant’s guilt was originally deferred, and he was placed on community supervision for four years. However, the State filed a motion to revoke appellant’s unadjudicated probation and, after a hearing, the trial court found him guilty and sentenced him accordingly.
However, appellant has now filed a motion to dismiss his appeal, which is signed by both appellant and his attorney of record. Because no opinion of this court has been delivered prior to our receipt of his request, his motion to dismiss is hereby granted. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).
Because we have dismissed this appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
John T. Boyd
Chief Justice
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Curtis Holland v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-holland-v-state-texapp-2001.