CURTIS GOLDING v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
This text of CURTIS GOLDING v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (CURTIS GOLDING v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
CURTIS GOLDING, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee.
No. 4D21-2696
[March 24, 2022]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Dale C. Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 99-007349 (37).
Curtis Golding, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
WARNER, LEVINE, and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
CURTIS GOLDING v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-golding-v-florida-department-of-revenue-fladistctapp-2022.