CURTIS EUGENE WILSON, III v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 23, 2018·No. 17-1506·Published

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

CURTIS EUGENE WILSON, III, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1506 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________)

Opinion filed March 23, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardee County; Marcus J. Ezelle, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

KHOUZAM, Judge.

We affirm the judgment and sentences of Curtis Eugene Wilson, III,

without comment. Our affirmance, however, is without prejudice for Mr. Wilson to file an

appropriate postconviction motion alleging the involuntariness of his plea. See Fla. R.

Crim. P. 3.850(a)(5); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(c); Koenig v. State, 597 So. 2d 256, 258

(Fla. 1992); Vance v. State, 796 So. 2d 1286, 1288 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). Affirmed.

MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CURTIS EUGENE WILSON, III v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

CURTIS EUGENE WILSON, III v. STATE OF FLORIDA (CURTIS EUGENE WILSON, III v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vance v. State
796 So. 2d 1286 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Koenig v. State
597 So. 2d 256 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)