CURTIS E. PENDERGRASS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of CURTIS E. PENDERGRASS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (CURTIS E. PENDERGRASS v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 5D23-2860 LT Case No. 2018-CF-009646-A _____________________________
CURTIS E. PENDERGRASS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
3.800 appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Kevin A. Blazs, Judge.
Curtis E. Pendergrass, Graceville, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Adam B. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
January 26, 2024
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).
JAY and KILBANE, JJ., concur. MAKAR, J., concurs in result, with opinion. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
2 Case No. 5D23-2860 LT Case No. 2018-CF-009646-A
MAKAR, J., concurring in result, with opinion.
I concur in affirmance but do not rely on the summary affirmance rule in doing so.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
CURTIS E. PENDERGRASS v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-e-pendergrass-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.