Curtis Charles Reichle v. State
This text of Curtis Charles Reichle v. State (Curtis Charles Reichle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE STATE OF TEXAS MANDATE TO THE 8TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOPKINS COUNTY, GREETINGS: Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 30th day of January, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:
Curtis Charles Reichle, Appellant No. 06-14-00073-CR
v. Trial Court No. 1423783
The State of Texas, Appellee
As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. We note that the appellant, Curtis Charles Reichle, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 14th day of May, A.D. 2015.
DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Curtis Charles Reichle v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-charles-reichle-v-state-texcrimapp-2015.