Curtis Brown v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary Fla. Dept. of Corr.
This text of Curtis Brown v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary Fla. Dept. of Corr. (Curtis Brown v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary Fla. Dept. of Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D18-5230 _____________________________
CURTIS BROWN,
Petitioner,
v.
MARK S. INCH, Secretary Fla. Dept. of Corr.,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.
January 28, 2019
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.
MAKAR, WINOKUR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Curtis Brown, pro se, Petitioner.
Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Curtis Brown v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary Fla. Dept. of Corr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-brown-v-mark-s-inch-secretary-fla-dept-of-corr-fladistctapp-2019.