Curtis Antonio Way v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 3, 2017
Docket16-3904
StatusPublished

This text of Curtis Antonio Way v. State of Florida (Curtis Antonio Way v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curtis Antonio Way v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

CURTIS ANTONIO WAY, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D16-3904

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

Opinion filed September 1, 2017.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original Jurisdiction.

Curtis Antonio Way, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

WINOKUR, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Curtis Antonio Way v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-antonio-way-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2017.