Curtis A. Ruff v. State
This text of Curtis A. Ruff v. State (Curtis A. Ruff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CURTIS A. RUFF,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-552
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed March 31, 2017
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Robert J. Egan, Judge.
Mark L. Horwitz and Cassandra Snapp, of Law Offices of Mark L. Horwitz, Orlando, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Curtis Ruff appeals his convictions and sentences for conspiracy to traffic in
cocaine 400 grams or more, trafficking in cocaine 400 grams or more, possession of a
structure for the purpose of trafficking in a controlled substance, and unlawful use of a
two-way communication device. We affirm the convictions and sentences but remand the case to correct a scrivener’s error. The judgment entered indicates that Ruff pleaded
nolo contendere to each of these counts when he was actually adjudicated guilty on these
four counts following a jury trial. Therefore, we remand the case to the trial court to correct
the judgment accordingly.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.
TORPY, WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Curtis A. Ruff v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-a-ruff-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.