Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Curtin v. Phipps Houses Services, Inc.

Curtin v. Phipps Houses Services, Inc.

297 A.D.2d 700, 747 N.Y.2d 388, 747 N.Y.S.2d 388, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8656
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 23, 2002
StatusPublished

This text of 297 A.D.2d 700 (Curtin v. Phipps Houses Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curtin v. Phipps Houses Services, Inc., 297 A.D.2d 700, 747 N.Y.2d 388, 747 N.Y.S.2d 388, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8656 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

The defendant failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324; Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851). In view of the foregoing, it is not necessary to consider the sufficiency of the opposing papers (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., supra). Altman, J.P., S. Miller, McGinity, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center
476 N.E.2d 642 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital
501 N.E.2d 572 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 700, 747 N.Y.2d 388, 747 N.Y.S.2d 388, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtin-v-phipps-houses-services-inc-nyappdiv-2002.