Curtin v. Hartford Insurance Group
This text of 677 So. 2d 1002 (Curtin v. Hartford Insurance Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the summary judgment in this case upon a conclusion that a deposition on file demonstrated triable issues of fact. Moreover, the record establishes that the opponent of the motion had not completed discovery, especially a deposition of an employee of the moving party which had been rescheduled at the request of the movant for a day after the hearing on the motion. In this latter regard, we find this case indistinguishable from our recent decision in Lubarsky v. Sweden House Properties of Boca Raton Inc., 673 So.2d 975 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
677 So. 2d 1002, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8669, 1996 WL 457227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtin-v-hartford-insurance-group-fladistctapp-1996.