Curtin v. Curtin
This text of 211 S.W.3d 640 (Curtin v. Curtin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
John M. Curtin (“father”) appeals the judgment of the trial court awarding Stacey L. Curtin (“mother”) attorney’s fees. Father claims the award was against the weight of the evidence.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
*641 The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
211 S.W.3d 640, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 81, 2007 WL 92614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtin-v-curtin-moctapp-2007.