Curtin v. Curtin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Curtin v. Curtin

211 S.W.3d 640, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 81, 2007 WL 92614

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 16, 2007·No. ED 87679·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John M. Curtin (“father”) appeals the judgment of the trial court awarding Stacey L. Curtin (“mother”) attorney’s fees. Father claims the award was against the weight of the evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*641 The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John M. Curtin (“father”) appeals the judgment of the trial court awarding Stacey L. Curtin (“mother”) attorney’s fees. Father claims the award was against the weight of the evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*641 The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Curtin v. Curtin, 211 S.W.3d 640, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 81, 2007 WL 92614 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

211 S.W.3d 640 (Curtin v. Curtin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.