Curtice v. Beardsly

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Curtice v. Beardsly

1 Root 441

DecidedAugust 15, 1792

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 441 (Curtice v. Beardsly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curtice v. Beardsly, 1 Root 441 (Colo. 1792).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

There is nothing erroneous in the judgment complained of; tbe plea contains matter sufficient to bar the plaintiff of a recovery; wbicb is traversed by tbe plaintiff, [443]*443and by the court found to be true; and any defect in point of form is aided by the verdict, or the finding of the court. The plea affirms that the plaintiff did discharge the defendants which is a fact denied by the plaintiff, and found by the court; how it was made out and evinced this court cannot inquire.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

There is nothing erroneous in the judgment complained of; tbe plea contains matter sufficient to bar the plaintiff of a recovery; wbicb is traversed by tbe plaintiff, [443]*443and by the court found to be true; and any defect in point of form is aided by the verdict, or the finding of the court. The plea affirms that the plaintiff did discharge the defendants which is a fact denied by the plaintiff, and found by the court; how it was made out and evinced this court cannot inquire.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtice-v-beardsly-conn-1792.