Curt Kramer & Carlos Alberto Mayo v. Zicix Corporation
This text of Curt Kramer & Carlos Alberto Mayo v. Zicix Corporation (Curt Kramer & Carlos Alberto Mayo v. Zicix Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion Granted; Order filed November 21, 2013.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-13-00823-CV ____________
THE VERTICAL TRADING GROUP, LLC, CURT KRAMER, AND CARLOS ALBERTO MAYO, Appellants
V.
ZICIX CORPORATION, Appellee
On Appeal from the 125th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012-50613
ORDER
On September 13, 2013, the three appellants named above filed notices of appeal from the trial court’s orders denying their special appearances. Appellants’ briefs were due October 17, 2013. Curt Kramer and Carlos Alberto Mayo filed their appellants’ brief on October 17, 2103. The Vertical Trading Group, LLC,
1 requested and was granted a two-week extension of time to file its brief until October 31, 2013.
On October 31, 2013, counsel for The Vertical Trading Group, LLC filed a motion to withdraw as counsel. According to the motion, The Vertical Trading Group, LLC consents to the motion, and it has been made aware that the deadline for filing its brief was October 31, 2013. More than ten days have passed, and no opposition to the motion has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.3(a). The motion complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5. Accordingly, we GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw.
Corporations may appear in court and be represented only by a licensed attorney. See Dell Dev. Corp. v. Best. Indus. Uniform Sup. Co., 743 S.W.2d 302, 303 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1987, writ denied). Accordingly, we ORDER appellant The Vertical Trading Group, LLC to retain counsel for this appeal and to file a designation of counsel on or before December 2, 2013. Unless The Vertical Trading Group, LLC, acting through an attorney licensed in Texas, files its appellant’s brief with the clerk of this court on or before December 23, 2013, the court will dismiss its appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Curt Kramer & Carlos Alberto Mayo v. Zicix Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curt-kramer-carlos-alberto-mayo-v-zicix-corporatio-texapp-2013.