Curry's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Curry's Appeal

27 Pa. 194, 1856 Pa. LEXIS 162

DecidedNovember 7, 1856

StatusPublished

This text of 27 Pa. 194 (Curry's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curry's Appeal, 27 Pa. 194, 1856 Pa. LEXIS 162 (Pa. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered,

by Lowrie, J.

Our judgment just entered in the case of Lytle v. Colt’s Executors, requires that this decree of distribution should be reversed, so far as relates to the claim'in that case. But we are not able to reform the decree so as to enter a final one, because we have not been furnished with the list of liens, and do not know how much remains yet due to the judgment of Hamilton and Wainwright. We must, therefore, reverse the decree and refer the case back to the Common Pleas for correction.

Decree reversed accordingly, at the cost of Elihu Marvin.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered,

by Lowrie, J.

Our judgment just entered in the case of Lytle v. Colt’s Executors, requires that this decree of distribution should be reversed, so far as relates to the claim'in that case. But we are not able to reform the decree so as to enter a final one, because we have not been furnished with the list of liens, and do not know how much remains yet due to the judgment of Hamilton and Wainwright. We must, therefore, reverse the decree and refer the case back to the Common Pleas for correction.

Decree reversed accordingly, at the cost of Elihu Marvin.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Pa. 194, 1856 Pa. LEXIS 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/currys-appeal-pa-1856.