Curry v. Warden
This text of Curry v. Warden (Curry v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8020
RALPH J. CURRY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN; FRANK TOSTON, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (1:08-cv-00151-BEL)
Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 25, 2009
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ralph J. Curry, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Lee Nilsson, GOODELL DEVRIES LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; John Francis Breads, Jr., Matthew Douglas Peter, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Ralph J. Curry appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Curry v. Warden, No. 1:08-cv-00151-BEL (D. Md. filed
Sept. 5, 2008 & entered Sept. 8, 2008). We deny Curry’s motion
for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Curry v. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curry-v-warden-ca4-2009.