Curry v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Curry v. Thompson

89 S.E. 603, 18 Ga. App. 507, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1066

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 31, 1916

Docket7339

StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E. 603 (Curry v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curry v. Thompson, 89 S.E. 603, 18 Ga. App. 507, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1066 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Hodges, J.

1. The evidence did not show the nature and character of the paper signed by the decedent, but it did show that he owed the plaintiff the money borrowed; therefore the court did not err in refusing to grant a nonsuit.

2. The court did not err in directing a verdict, and no error was committed in the exclusion of evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Evans & Evans, for plaintiff in error. A. R. Wright, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hodges, J.

1. The evidence did not show the nature and character of the paper signed by the decedent, but it did show that he owed the plaintiff the money borrowed; therefore the court did not err in refusing to grant a nonsuit.

2. The court did not err in directing a verdict, and no error was committed in the exclusion of evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Evans & Evans, for plaintiff in error. A. R. Wright, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.E. 603, 18 Ga. App. 507, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curry-v-thompson-gactapp-1916.