Curry v. State

295 S.W.2d 214, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2073
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 14, 1956
DocketNo. 28592
StatusPublished

This text of 295 S.W.2d 214 (Curry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curry v. State, 295 S.W.2d 214, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2073 (Tex. 1956).

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of forgery, with a previous conviction for like offense, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for seven years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts, in the absence of which the exceptions to the court’s charge cannot be considered. There are no formal bills of exception.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
295 S.W.2d 214, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curry-v-state-texcrimapp-1956.