Curry v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Curry v. State

216 S.W. 165, 86 Tex. Crim. 234, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 386

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 12, 1919·No. No. 5551.·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

—This conviction was for manufacturing intoxicating liquors in violation of the State-wide prohibition statute, passed by the Fourth Called Session of the Thirty-fifth Legislature, found on page 37 of those Acts. The majority opinion of this court has held this law valid in Ex parte Davis, 86 Texas Crim. Rep., 168 and Ex parte Fulton, 86 Texas Crim. Rep., 149 recently decided. I gave my reasons for believing otherwise, which are of record. It is unnecessary for me to write further on that subject, and in obedience to the opinion of the majority the judgment herein will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

—This conviction was for manufacturing intoxicating liquors in violation of the State-wide prohibition statute, passed by the Fourth Called Session of the Thirty-fifth Legislature, found on page 37 of those Acts. The majority opinion of this court has held this law valid in Ex parte Davis, 86 Texas Crim. Rep., 168 and Ex parte Fulton, 86 Texas Crim. Rep., 149 recently decided. I gave my reasons for believing otherwise, which are of record. It is unnecessary for me to write further on that subject, and in obedience to the opinion of the majority the judgment herein will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Curry v. State, 216 S.W. 165, 86 Tex. Crim. 234, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 386 (Tex. 1919).

Pincite

216 S.W. 165 (Curry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related