Curry v. State
796 S.W.2d 895, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1069, 1990 WL 167061
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curry v. State, 796 S.W.2d 895, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1069, 1990 WL 167061 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).
796 S.W.2d 895 (Curry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.