Curry v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Curry v. State

82 S.E. 307, 14 Ga. App. 764, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 446

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Curry v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 Ga. App. 377 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 7, 1914·No. 5763·Published

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

The trial was not free from errors which in a close case would require a new trial, but inasmuch as there was evidence which would have authorized a verdict finding the accused guilty of murder, and all the other evidence in the case, as well as the statement of the defendant himself, demanded the verdict finding Mm guilty of voluntary manslaughter, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, C. J.

The trial was not free from errors which in a close case would require a new trial, but inasmuch as there was evidence which would have authorized a verdict finding the accused guilty of murder, and all the other evidence in the case, as well as the statement of the defendant himself, demanded the verdict finding Mm guilty of voluntary manslaughter, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Curry v. State, 82 S.E. 307, 14 Ga. App. 764, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 446 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

82 S.E. 307 (Curry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.