Curry v. State
18 So. 3d 1261, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15581, 2009 WL 3271283
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Curry v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 967 So. 2d 918 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Baugh v. State, 961 So.2d 198, 204 (Fla.2007) (“There is sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction if, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, a rational trier of fact could find the existence of the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”); T.H. v. State, 899 So.2d 504 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (holding that sufficient evidence established that automobile recovered was same automobile stolen from victim).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curry v. State, 18 So. 3d 1261, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15581, 2009 WL 3271283 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
18 So. 3d 1261 (Curry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baugh v. State
961 So. 2d 198 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)
T.H. v. State
899 So. 2d 504 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)