Curry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Curry v. State

510 So. 2d 317, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 811, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6186

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 18, 1987

DocketNo. 85-2892

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 510 So. 2d 317 (Curry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curry v. State, 510 So. 2d 317, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 811, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6186 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

LETTS, Judge.

The petition for rehearing is granted. The original opinion is withdrawn and we substitute the following opinion:

The defendant was charged and convicted of robbery. Among other points raised, the defendant contends that the trial court erred in refusing a requested jury instruction on theft, aggravated assault and simple assault. Although the trial court found that there was a total lack of evidence as to the necessarily lesser included offense, case law provides that, upon request, the defendant is entitled to an instruction on necessarily lesser included offenses. Brown v. State, 206 So.2d 377 (Fla.1968). However, there is no need to instruct on a requested lesser offense which is not necessarily included in the charged offense, when there is a total lack of evidence as to the lesser offense. State v. Abreau, 363 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1978).

In this particular case, theft is the only necessarily lesser included offense as it is but one step removed from the robbery offense. Thus, failure to give it here constitutes reversible error. See Williams v. State, 461 So.2d 1010 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

We also note that the trial court imposed court costs pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985), without giving notice and having a hearing to re-determine whether he is an indigent after his trial. Notice is not necessary because the statute taxing costs gives the defendant the option to seek community service. Davis v. State, 501 So.2d 744 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Mays v. State, 502 So.2d 1330 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Otherwise, notice is mandated. Lawton v. State, 492 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s conviction and remand for a new trial.

HERSEY, C.J., and STONE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

LETTS, Judge.

The petition for rehearing is granted. The original opinion is withdrawn and we substitute the following opinion:

The defendant was charged and convicted of robbery. Among other points raised, the defendant contends that the trial court erred in refusing a requested jury instruction on theft, aggravated assault and simple assault. Although the trial court found that there was a total lack of evidence as to the necessarily lesser included offense, case law provides that, upon request, the defendant is entitled to an instruction on necessarily lesser included offenses. Brown v. State, 206 So.2d 377 (Fla.1968). However, there is no need to instruct on a requested lesser offense which is not necessarily included in the charged offense, when there is a total lack of evidence as to the lesser offense. State v. Abreau, 363 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1978).

In this particular case, theft is the only necessarily lesser included offense as it is but one step removed from the robbery offense. Thus, failure to give it here constitutes reversible error. See Williams v. State, 461 So.2d 1010 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

We also note that the trial court imposed court costs pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985), without giving notice and having a hearing to re-determine whether he is an indigent after his trial. Notice is not necessary because the statute taxing costs gives the defendant the option to seek community service. Davis v. State, 501 So.2d 744 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Mays v. State, 502 So.2d 1330 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Otherwise, notice is mandated. Lawton v. State, 492 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s conviction and remand for a new trial.

HERSEY, C.J., and STONE, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

510 So. 2d 317, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 811, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curry-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack