Curry v. Skidmore
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-10508
Conference Calendar
RONNIE F. CURRY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
MAJ. SKIDMORE, Director of Administration; R. Hayes, Capt., Warden, Greenbay Facility; TARRANT COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CV-123-Y
- - - - - - - - - -
December 20, 1995
Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Ronnie F. Curry appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. He argues that the facility in which he is incarcerated has no law library and/or he was denied access to a law library or legal assistance.
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
*
Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.
No. 95-10508
-2-
essentially the reasons given by the district court. Curry v. Skidmore, No. 3:95-CV-123-Y (N.D. Tex. April 28, 1995). In view of the disposition of Curry's appeal, his motion for leave to amend his complaint, motion for production of documents, and motion to compel production of documents are DENIED.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curry v. Skidmore (Curry v. Skidmore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.