Curry v. Patterson

38 A. 594, 183 Pa. 238, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 747
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 8, 1897·No. Appeal, No. 97·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

The facts upon wbieb tliis contention depends are set forth in tbe case stated, and need not be repeated. As to the questions arising upon those facts, all that need be said will be found in tbe opinion of tbe learned judge of the common pleas. On tbat opinion the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curry v. Patterson, 38 A. 594, 183 Pa. 238, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 747 (Pa. 1897).

38 A. 594 (Curry v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald
73 Pa. D. & C. 170 (Bradford County Orphans' Court, 1950)
Kimberlin v. Hicks
94 P.2d 335 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1939)
Glenn v. Stewart
108 A. 599 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Birge v. Nucomb
105 A. 335 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1918)
Heyer v. Kranch
52 Pa. Super. 635 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)
United States v. John II Estate, Ltd.
3 D. Haw. 575 (D. Hawaii, 1910)
Beilstein v. Beilstein
45 A. 73 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)