Curry v. . Nassau Electric Railroad Company

New York Court of Appeals

Curry v. . Nassau Electric Railroad Company

92 N.E. 1099, 198 N.Y. 514, 1910 N.Y. LEXIS 849

DecidedMarch 1, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 92 N.E. 1099 (Curry v. . Nassau Electric Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curry v. . Nassau Electric Railroad Company, 92 N.E. 1099, 198 N.Y. 514, 1910 N.Y. LEXIS 849 (N.Y. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the evidence presented a questionof fact for the jury on the question whether the defendant’s servants used excessive and unnecessary force in removing the plaintiff from the defendant’s car and that, hence, the motion for a nonsuit was properly denied; and that the question argued by defendant’s counsel, as to the obligation of the defendant’s employees to accept the five-dollar bill tendered and give change therefor is not raised by any exception which this court can review.

Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Werner and Hiscock, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the evidence presented a questionof fact for the jury on the question whether the defendant’s servants used excessive and unnecessary force in removing the plaintiff from the defendant’s car and that, hence, the motion for a nonsuit was properly denied; and that the question argued by defendant’s counsel, as to the obligation of the defendant’s employees to accept the five-dollar bill tendered and give change therefor is not raised by any exception which this court can review.

Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Werner and Hiscock, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 N.E. 1099, 198 N.Y. 514, 1910 N.Y. LEXIS 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curry-v-nassau-electric-railroad-company-ny-1910.