Curry v. May

Superior Court of Delaware

Curry v. May

4 Del. 173

DecidedJuly 1, 1844

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Del. 173 (Curry v. May) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curry v. May, 4 Del. 173 (Del. Ct. App. 1844).

Pincite

Opinion

A majority of the'court refused the nonsuit. Judge Harrington [176]*176differed on the ground that the contract as alledged was of a purchase of twelve hundred cords of wood, of which two hundred cords more or less, should be seasoned wood; whereas the contract was for one thousand cords of wood, of which about two hundred cords should be seasoned.

Houston, for plaintiffs. Layton and Cullen, for defendants.

The plaintiffs had a verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A majority of the'court refused the nonsuit. Judge Harrington [176]*176differed on the ground that the contract as alledged was of a purchase of twelve hundred cords of wood, of which two hundred cords more or less, should be seasoned wood; whereas the contract was for one thousand cords of wood, of which about two hundred cords should be seasoned.

Houston, for plaintiffs. Layton and Cullen, for defendants.

The plaintiffs had a verdict.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Del. 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curry-v-may-delsuperct-1844.