Curry v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:22-cv-00022 Chico Nakia Curry, Plaintiff, V. Director Bobby Lumpkin - Director TDCJ-CID et al., Defendants.

ORDER Plaintiff Chico Nakia Curry, proceeding pro se and 7 forma pau- peris, filed this civil-rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a report and recommendation concluding that plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 21) should be denied for lack of jurisdiction. Doc. 26. Plaintiff did not object to the report and recommendation. When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and recommenda- tion, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having re- viewed the magistrate judge’s report and being satisfied that it con- tains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommenda- tion. For the reasons stated in the report, plaintiff’s motion for pre- liminary injunction is denied for lack of jurisdiction. So ordered by the court on November 9, 2022. fale BARKER United States District Judge