Curry v. Lovell
This text of 6 F. Cas. 996 (Curry v. Lovell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rule to show cause why this execution should not be quashed. Curry recovered judgment against Lovell before B. More, a justice of the peace for Washington county, on the 2Gth of August, 1801. Lovell obtained a supersedeas under the act of assembly of Maryland, until the 2Gth of February, 1802, and in the mean time removed to Alexandria county. When the supersedeas had expired, the plaintiff obtained a new warrant from a justice of the peace in Alexandria county, and recovered judgment and took out execution there which was not satisfied, Lovell having removed back to this county. The plaintiff then took out the present execution on the supersedeas here. Rule discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 F. Cas. 996, 1 Cranch 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curry-v-lovell-circtddc-1802.