Curry v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Curry v. Holmes

32 So. 2d 39, 249 Ala. 545, 1947 Ala. LEXIS 420

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJuly 31, 1947

Docket2 Div. 221.

StatusPublished

Cited by14 cases

This text of 32 So. 2d 39 (Curry v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curry v. Holmes, 32 So. 2d 39, 249 Ala. 545, 1947 Ala. LEXIS 420 (Ala. 1947).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion the case of Maya v. Smith, 239 Ala. 470, 196 So. 125, construing the provisions of what are now §§ 750 and 808, Title 7, Code 1940, supports the motion of appellants for a revival against the personal representative or the heirs at law of John Holmes, deceased; and that the instant case is to be differentiated from that of Williams v. Knight, 232 Ala. 206, 167 So. 284, upon which counsel for appellee relies, which authority is referred to and distinguished in the Maya case.

We are, therefore; of the opinion that the motion of appellants should be granted, and that the motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal should be denied.

It is so ordered;

Motion of appellants granted; motion of appellees denied. •

All the justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI