Curry v. Erie City
58 A. 476, 209 Pa. 283, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 609
Opinion
The only question in this case is on the contributory negligence of the plaintiff in riding her bicycle into a hole in the street without properly looking where she was going. But though called by most of the witnesses a hole, the defect was rather a depression caused by the subsidence of the foundation so that the surface of the asphalt had sunk but was not broken, and there was testimony that the defect was not noticeable until the rider came near it. Under such circumstances the question of negligence was for the jury.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curry v. Erie City, 58 A. 476, 209 Pa. 283, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 609 (Pa. 1904).
58 A. 476 (Curry v. Erie City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Feldman v. Riccordino
58 Pa. Super. 114 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Brown v. Milligan
33 Pa. Super. 244 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)