Curry v. CORNERSTONE BUILDING GROUP, INC.
776 N.W.2d 898, 485 Mich. 1043
Opinion
Brent CURRY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CORNERSTONE BUILDING GROUP, INC., Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Pac-Van, Inc., Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff, and
Straight Arrow Modular, L.L.C., Defendant, and
Conti Electric, Inc., Third-Party Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 31, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., not participating due to a familial relationship with counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curry v. CORNERSTONE BUILDING GROUP, INC., 776 N.W.2d 898, 485 Mich. 1043 (Mich. 2010).
776 N.W.2d 898 (Curry v. CORNERSTONE BUILDING GROUP, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.