Curry v. Congress Hall Hotel Co.

73 A. 124, 75 N.J.L. 735, 46 Vroom 735, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 272
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 18, 1907
StatusPublished

This text of 73 A. 124 (Curry v. Congress Hall Hotel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curry v. Congress Hall Hotel Co., 73 A. 124, 75 N.J.L. 735, 46 Vroom 735, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 272 (N.J. 1907).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court brought up by this writ of error is affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court in the cause.

[736]*736For affirmance — Magie, Chancellor, The Chief Justice, Garrison, I-Iendriokson, Swayze, Reed, Trenohakd, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 A. 124, 75 N.J.L. 735, 46 Vroom 735, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curry-v-congress-hall-hotel-co-nj-1907.