Curry v. Aurora

Superior Court, S. D. Florida

Curry v. Aurora

2 F. Cas. 227, 1840 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17

DecidedNovember 28, 1840

StatusPublished

This text of 2 F. Cas. 227 (Curry v. Aurora) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court, S. D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curry v. Aurora, 2 F. Cas. 227, 1840 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17 (superctsdfla 1840).

Pincite

Opinion

Nov. 28, 1840.

Salvage—Compensation—Forfeiture.

. [Cited in Marv. Wr. & Salv. 232, as having held that where wreckers had unnecessarily lightened the bark of 205 bales of cotton, in order to magnify their services and obtain a larger salvage than that to which they were justly entitled, their whole salvage should be forfeited, notwithstanding they had rendered important services.]

[Note. Nowhere reported; opinion by MARVIN, J., not now accessible.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nov. 28, 1840.

Salvage—Compensation—Forfeiture.

. [Cited in Marv. Wr. & Salv. 232, as having held that where wreckers had unnecessarily lightened the bark of 205 bales of cotton, in order to magnify their services and obtain a larger salvage than that to which they were justly entitled, their whole salvage should be forfeited, notwithstanding they had rendered important services.]

[Note. Nowhere reported; opinion by MARVIN, J., not now accessible.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 F. Cas. 227, 1840 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curry-v-aurora-superctsdfla-1840.