Curry Chevrolet Sales & Service, Inc. v. Hudson Equities, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Curry Chevrolet Sales & Service, Inc. v. Hudson Equities, Inc.

26 A.D.2d 777, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3518

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 24, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 777 (Curry Chevrolet Sales & Service, Inc. v. Hudson Equities, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curry Chevrolet Sales & Service, Inc. v. Hudson Equities, Inc., 26 A.D.2d 777, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3518 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon the stipulation of the parties, dated July 26, 1966, amending the notice of appeal so as to state therein that the appeal (from an order of the County Court, Westchester County, entered May 12, 1966) is to the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, Second Judicial Department, instead of to the Appellate Division, the notice of appeal is thus amended and the appeal is transferred to said Appellate Term. The appeal was erroneously taken to this court. The Appellate Term is presently vested with jurisdiction of such appeals (see N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 5, subd. b; § 8, subd. d; order of this court No. 47, as amd.). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon the stipulation of the parties, dated July 26, 1966, amending the notice of appeal so as to state therein that the appeal (from an order of the County Court, Westchester County, entered May 12, 1966) is to the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, Second Judicial Department, instead of to the Appellate Division, the notice of appeal is thus amended and the appeal is transferred to said Appellate Term. The appeal was erroneously taken to this court. The Appellate Term is presently vested with jurisdiction of such appeals (see N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 5, subd. b; § 8, subd. d; order of this court No. 47, as amd.). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 777, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curry-chevrolet-sales-service-inc-v-hudson-equities-inc-nyappdiv-1966.