Curry (Bakari) Vs. State
This text of Curry (Bakari) Vs. State (Curry (Bakari) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
BAKARI MAURICE CURRY, No. 79329 Appellant, VS.
THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent. t" 2019 EL! A. BROWN CLE ,FREME COURT BY CEPLr Y CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a judgment of conviction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Joseph Hardy, Jr., Judge. This court's preliminary review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district court entered the judgment of conviction on September 5, 2018. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal, however, until July 31, 2019, well after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). "[A]n untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court." Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352. 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Hardesty
,J J. Stiglich Silver
11-31374 cc: Hon. Joseph Hardy, Jr., District Judge Bakari Maurice Curry Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 44e1r, 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Curry (Bakari) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curry-bakari-vs-state-nev-2019.