Curry (Bakari) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided September 6, 2019·No. 79329·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

BAKARI MAURICE CURRY, No. 79329 Appellant,

VS.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent.

t" 2019

EL! A. BROWN CLE ,FREME COURT BY

CEPLr Y CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a judgment of conviction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Joseph Hardy, Jr., Judge.

This court's preliminary review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district court entered the judgment of conviction on September 5, 2018. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal, however, until July 31, 2019, well after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). "[A]n untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court." Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352. 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Hardesty

,J J.

Stiglich Silver

11-31374

cc: Hon. Joseph Hardy, Jr., District Judge Bakari Maurice Curry Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 44e1r,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curry (Bakari) Vs. State, (Neb. 2019).

Curry (Bakari) Vs. State (Curry (Bakari) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lozada v. State
871 P.2d 944 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1994)