Currier v. March
This text of 107 Me. 523 (Currier v. March) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Assumpsit to recover the sum of $36.28 alleged by the plaintiff to be due him by the defendants for commissions on renewal premiums collected for the Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company for the year 1908. At the conclusion of the evidence the case was reported to the Law Court for determination. The rescript says : "The court being evenly divided upon the testimony, upon the question whether the plaintiff actively represented the defendants during the year 1908, the report is discharged and the case is remitted to nisi prius for further hearing.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 Me. 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/currier-v-march-me-1910.