Currier v. Hodgdon

3 N.H. 82
CourtSuperior Court of New Hampshire
DecidedSeptember 15, 1824
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 3 N.H. 82 (Currier v. Hodgdon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Currier v. Hodgdon, 3 N.H. 82 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1824).

Opinion

By the court.

The original contract having in this case been duly assigned to the plaintiff, an equitable interest became vested in him, which would, in case of any breach of the contract, have entitled him to maintain an action in Cove's name ; and it is settled, that such an equitable interest is a sufficient consideration to sustain an express promise. 10 Mass. Rep. 316, Crocker vs. Whitney.—12 ditto 281, Mowry vs. Todd.—44 John. 378, Doty vs. Wilson.—Couper 290, Hawes vs. Saunders.—6 Mass. Rep. 42.—2 W. Black. 1269, Fenner vs. A Meares.

We are therefore of opinion, that the plaintiffis entitled to

Judgment on the verdict,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. Emery
27 N.H. 269 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1853)
Tibbets v. Gerrish
25 N.H. 41 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1852)
Edson v. Fuller
22 N.H. 183 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1850)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.H. 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/currier-v-hodgdon-nhsuperct-1824.