Currier v. Hale

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Currier v. Hale

90 Mass. 47

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1864

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 90 Mass. 47 (Currier v. Hale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Currier v. Hale, 90 Mass. 47 (Mass. 1864).

Pincite

Opinion

Dewey, J."

The court properly ruled that it was not competent to prove by paroi evidence such an agreement as to the note as was proposed, and that the defence relied upon could not avail the defendant. Of the numerous authorities that might be cited to sustain such ruling, those of St. Louis Ins. Co. v. Homer, 9 Met. 39, Adams v. Wilson, 12 Met. 138, and Tower v. Richardson, 6 Allen, 351, may be referred to as especially in point. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dewey, J."

The court properly ruled that it was not competent to prove by paroi evidence such an agreement as to the note as was proposed, and that the defence relied upon could not avail the defendant. Of the numerous authorities that might be cited to sustain such ruling, those of St. Louis Ins. Co. v. Homer, 9 Met. 39, Adams v. Wilson, 12 Met. 138, and Tower v. Richardson, 6 Allen, 351, may be referred to as especially in point. Exceptions overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 Mass. 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/currier-v-hale-mass-1864.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack