Currie v. State

103 S.E. 474, 25 Ga. App. 399, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 834
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 15, 1920
Docket11449
StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 474 (Currie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Currie v. State, 103 S.E. 474, 25 Ga. App. 399, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 834 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Luke, J.

On the hearing of the motion to change the venue in this case, wherein the defendant was charged with murder, there was evidence that he could get a fair trial in the county in which it was alleged that he committed the crime, and that he would be in no danger of bodily harm; and, from a careful examination of the record, this court can not say that the judge who heard the evidence and denied the motion abused the discretion with which he is by law charged.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 474, 25 Ga. App. 399, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/currie-v-state-gactapp-1920.