Currie v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Currie v. State

168 So. 910, 124 Fla. 243, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1095

DecidedMay 13, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 168 So. 910 (Currie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Currie v. State, 168 So. 910, 124 Fla. 243, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1095 (Fla. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of error brings for review judgment of conviction of the statutory offense of having sexual intercourse with an unmarried female under the age of eighteen years of previous chaste character.

We have examined the record and find no reversible error. Neither do we find reflected by the assignment of error or the argument in briefs' any questions presented that *244 warrant discussion in an opinion. The judgment should be affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI