Currie v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Currie v. State

168 So. 910, 124 Fla. 243, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1095

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 13, 1936·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of error brings for review judgment of conviction of the statutory offense of having sexual intercourse with an unmarried female under the age of eighteen years of previous chaste character.

We have examined the record and find no reversible error. Neither do we find reflected by the assignment of error or the argument in briefs' any questions presented that *244 warrant discussion in an opinion. The judgment should be affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The writ of error brings for review judgment of conviction of the statutory offense of having sexual intercourse with an unmarried female under the age of eighteen years of previous chaste character.

We have examined the record and find no reversible error. Neither do we find reflected by the assignment of error or the argument in briefs' any questions presented that *244 warrant discussion in an opinion. The judgment should be affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Currie v. State, 168 So. 910, 124 Fla. 243, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1095 (Fla. 1936).

Pincite

168 So. 910 (Currie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.